|
|
Boost : |
From: Ullrich Koethe (koethe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-18 16:56:25
HI Hailin,
> we just tried your test file with GCC 4.0.2, GCC 4.1.1 and
> Visual Studio 2005 (VC8). I used Cygwin for both GCC tests. My machine
> is Xeon 3.2 dual CPU. Both proxy and accessor implementation run at the
> SAME speed (release builds: -O2 for GCC and /O2 for Visual Studio). So
> could it be that GCC 3 is not doing a good in optimizing the code?
>
Apparently. So this is a non-issue then. Interestingly, the transformation
interleaved => planar is faster than planar => interleaved. Is this also
true on your platforms?
Ulli
-- ________________________________________________________________ | | | Ullrich Koethe Universitaet Hamburg / University of Hamburg | | FB Informatik / Dept. of Informatics | | AB Kognitive Systeme / Cognitive Systems Group | | | | Phone: +49 (0)40 42883-2573 Vogt-Koelln-Str. 30 | | Fax: +49 (0)40 42883-2572 D - 22527 Hamburg | | Email: u.koethe_at_[hidden] Germany | | koethe_at_[hidden] | | WWW: http://kogs-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/~koethe/ | |________________________________________________________________|
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk