Boost logo

Boost :

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-18 18:24:35

Ullrich Koethe wrote:
> HI Hailin,
> > we just tried your test file with GCC 4.0.2, GCC 4.1.1 and
>> Visual Studio 2005 (VC8). I used Cygwin for both GCC tests. My machine
>> is Xeon 3.2 dual CPU. Both proxy and accessor implementation run at the
>> SAME speed (release builds: -O2 for GCC and /O2 for Visual Studio). So
>> could it be that GCC 3 is not doing a good in optimizing the code?
> Apparently. So this is a non-issue then. Interestingly, the transformation
> interleaved => planar is faster than planar => interleaved. Is this also
> true on your platforms?

G++ is a poor compiler to test for optimization and speed. Use VC8
instead. It produces one of the tightest code so far.


Joel de Guzman

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at