Boost logo

Boost :

From: Christopher Kohlhoff (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-18 19:55:18

Dean Michael Berris wrote: > The question would be whether there will be (or whether there > already is) a "generic" active object implementation? We've > found that Boost.Asio's io_service is a good scheduler/queue > and using a futures wrapper for the result types. An alternative to having an io_service per active object is to have multiple active objects share a single io_service (would these be called "semi-active objects"?). If you also use a strand per active object, then the active objects can even share an io_service with a thread pool calling io_service::run(). The strand will ensure that the operations for a single active object don't execute concurrently. Cheers, Chris

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at