From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-20 05:54:17
After the call for volunteers to clear the regression failures (can't
help with those, currently no access to the relevant platforms), I think
it's also time to get busy with the remaining inspection failures:
- The *X* report doesn't look too bad, all of the few remaining problems
seem to be in libraries that are currently actively maintained.
- The *LC* report however does not look good at all. There are a large
number of problems and some of them are in public areas (e.g. people) or
not actively maintained libs (e.g. pool).
What should we do about the *LC* problems? Is it worth bothering with
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk