From: Shams (shams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-25 21:15:43
How far can we use the Boost.BGL as a generic tree container.
* I mean why SoC Boost.Tree when BGL is around?
* If BLG has limitations then couldn't that be extended/prettified instead
of the Soc Tree container?
* Can someone please clarify/rationalize the differences/similarities?
Also I noticed that Boost.Interprocess had some sort of tree
* Why the reason for this and if used internally then what is for, otherwise
can't it be
just made generic for everyone to use instead of the SoC Tree
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk