From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-26 09:22:08
| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Martin Wille
| Sent: 26 October 2006 12:23
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: Re: [boost] GIL Review
| Joel de Guzman wrote:
| > I move to remove private reviews from the review process.
| I agree that the review text should become public.
| A reason for not submitting a review to the list would be that the
| reviewer is not subscribed on it and doesn't intend to
| subscribe (e.g.
| an expert on the particular field covered by the library
| under review
| but without much interest for Boost in general).
| So instead of eliminating the opportunity to submit reviews
| directly to
| the review manager, I'd like to see adding of "who will then
| forward the
| review text to the mailing list" after "Privately to the
| Review Manager".
I agree strongly with this - the expertise of the Boost group is thin in some fields, especially applications - like Math functions
and statistics ;-)
It would be foolish to do anything to make getting comment from experts difficult.
Joinging the group is not totally hassle free.
But I also strongly agree that the text of their reviews must be made public.
(And their name, but not necessarily their email address which may thereby be exposed to spam).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk