From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-07 06:20:05
Currently the Boost.TR1 <memory> fails one conformance test,
bad_weak_ptr::what() returns 'boost::bad_weak_ptr' and it should return
Any violent objections against changing it to conform in HEAD?
Any ordinary objections against changing it in 1.34 as well?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk