Boost logo

Boost :

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-07 15:07:07


These is purely release related. I don't have an opinion on the issue

Peter Dimov wrote:
> Currently the Boost.TR1 <memory> fails one conformance test,
> bad_weak_ptr::what() returns 'boost::bad_weak_ptr' and it should return
> 'tr1::bad_weak_ptr'.
> Any violent objections against changing it to conform in HEAD?
> Any ordinary objections against changing it in 1.34 as well?

If it's OK for head, it's OK for 1.34.0.


Thomas Witt

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at