From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-10 04:29:21
| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental
| Sent: 09 November 2006 20:38
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test feature request
| "Paul A Bristow" <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| > I'd also like to see additional macros provided to exactly
| > BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE (and warn and require of course) but with
| > names
| > BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE_PERCENT ...
| > to reduce continuing confusion with percent and fractions.
| There is already
| BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE and BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE_FRACTION. First
| based on percent
| tolerance. Second is based on fraction tolerance
Yes, but it's a matter of making it absolutely clear to the reader that the check is with tolerance as a percent - without him
having to re-check the docs to refresh his (in my case failing) memory.
--- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk