From: François Duranleau (duranlef_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-10 14:17:18
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
> I think that the two important issues where are:
> 1) Boost should have these types defined outside of any domain-specific library.
> I think they equivalent to other types such a complex numbers, and should exist
> as primitives for use in many different libraries. There seems to be some
> support for this from others:
I personally agree that Boost should have this type of matrices and
vectors. But for one thing, instead to designing a new interface or
library, I would seriously think about integrating static sized matrices
and vectors into uBLAS. I don't see any good reasons why we shouldn't mix
the two kinds.
-- François Duranleau LIGUM, Université de Montréal
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk