From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-10 14:14:39
Robert Ramey wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> Robert Ramey wrote:
> But my larger point is that once the decision is made to "branch for
> then only the last bug fixes should go into the branch. In my view it was a
> grave error to "branch for release" and then declare - we're going to
> with V2. Much better would be to say: Hence forth in the HEAD - only V2
> will be used. Then after a while when the HEAD seems to be running pretty
> smoothly, then "branch for release" and make the last changes.
Sounds good. We'll try this approach the next time.
> In other
> changes/additions for features shouldn't be made in a release branch. That
> ends up consuming lots of time.
FWIW the decision to use v2 was made a long time ago.
PS: What's the status with respect to outstanding serialization
regressions. Is there anything I can do to help get these fixed?
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk