Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-13 10:10:16

Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Jaakko Järvi wrote:
>> On May 17, 2005, at 10:22 PM, Larry Evans wrote:
>>> On 05/17/2005 10:07 PM, Jaakko Järvi wrote:
> [...]
>>> I'd suggest making variant part of mpl. With that, the problem
>>> disappears.
>> Yes, variant, mpl, tuple (or fusion), should play well together.
>> A good first step would be to start using the same type to mark that
>> no type was specified (instead of the variations void_, null_t, ...).
> FYI, variant is now a valid fusion sequence.

I don't get it. What are the values of the non-stored elements?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at