From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-13 10:10:16
Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Jaakko JÃ¤rvi wrote:
>> On May 17, 2005, at 10:22 PM, Larry Evans wrote:
>>> On 05/17/2005 10:07 PM, Jaakko JÃ¤rvi wrote:
>>> I'd suggest making variant part of mpl. With that, the problem
>> Yes, variant, mpl, tuple (or fusion), should play well together.
>> A good first step would be to start using the same type to mark that
>> no type was specified (instead of the variations void_, null_t, ...).
> FYI, variant is now a valid fusion sequence.
I don't get it. What are the values of the non-stored elements?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk