From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-13 13:17:01
David Abrahams wrote:
> Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Jaakko JÃ¤rvi wrote:
>>> On May 17, 2005, at 10:22 PM, Larry Evans wrote:
>>>> On 05/17/2005 10:07 PM, Jaakko JÃ¤rvi wrote:
>>>> I'd suggest making variant part of mpl. With that, the problem
>>> Yes, variant, mpl, tuple (or fusion), should play well together.
>>> A good first step would be to start using the same type to mark that
>>> no type was specified (instead of the variations void_, null_t, ...).
>> FYI, variant is now a valid fusion sequence.
> I don't get it. What are the values of the non-stored elements?
Default constructed *only* when dereferenced. Iteration only does
not touch the data.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk