|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] FW: Suggestion for boost`s smart pointers"
- Previous message: Pedro Lamarão: "Re: [boost] [thread] Some thoughts about "atomic""
- In reply to: Johan Råde: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
- Next in thread: Kim Barrett: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
- Reply: Kim Barrett: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
- Reply: Johan R�de: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
- Reply: Johan R�de: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
Johan Råde wrote:
> John,
>
> Do you have time to test the fpclassify library again?
> The the testing you did last time was very useful.
> (I think the tests that failed then time will pass now.)
Well this is no fun at all, I can't break it anymore! :-)
Seriously though it passes on all the platforms I can think of (and test
on).
I did have to add "uLL" to the end of the 64-bit constants though to get it
to compile with gcc-3.4.4 on Linux/Xeon.
This is a tricky one because you need uLL if uint64_t is a long long and
ui64 if it's a MSVC++ specific unsigned __int64.
HTH, John.
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] FW: Suggestion for boost`s smart pointers"
- Previous message: Pedro Lamarão: "Re: [boost] [thread] Some thoughts about "atomic""
- In reply to: Johan Råde: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
- Next in thread: Kim Barrett: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
- Reply: Kim Barrett: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
- Reply: Johan R�de: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
- Reply: Johan R�de: "Re: [boost] Optimized portable isnan, isfinite, fpclassify etc"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk