Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-01 11:32:46

Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
> Ouch! I wasn't aware John already attacked this one. I've looked up
> his post, compared the patches and, IMHO, looks like mine is slightly
> more preferable because it does not disable the UDT tests for broken
> compilers.

In that case, I'm happy to go with yours :-)

> Anyway, what we need is that either patch is applied so that we begin
> clearing down the few remaining regressions between us and 1.34.0
> beta1.

Ain't that the truth!


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at