Re: [boost] Numerical Quadrature Library/Boost.Accumulators

From: Franck Stauffer (franck_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-07 16:21:32

On Dec 7, 2006, at 9:29 PM, Matthias Schabel wrote:

> As far as I can see, precision needs to be the same type as the
> return type since it represents
> uncertainty in the latter. That is, the range of possible return
> values would be [result - n*error,
> result + n*error]. Do you have a case in mind where this isn't true?

This is always true when you can define such an interval, which is  
not the case for an integral of a complex valued function ( no "<" on  
complex) .