From: Minh Phanivong (m_phanivong_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-07 22:23:16
How about boost:dbi? short for database interface. Its short, obvious and to
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mateusz Loskot" <mateusz_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] SOCI 2.2.0 - The C++ Database Access Library
> Paul A Bristow wrote:
>>> -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Garland
>>> Sent: 07 December 2006 22:37 To: boost_at_[hidden] Subject: Re:
>>> [boost] SOCI 2.2.0 - The C++ Database Access Library
>>>> Whatever we pick, I think we should avoid any name that isn't
>>>> pretty immediately clear on a quick scan. With a few exceptions
>>> (i.e. Spirit),
>>>> you can quickly tell what a boost library does based solely
>>> on it's name.
>>> Right, I think Boost.DatabaseAccess is pretty clear.
>> But rather long :-(
>> How about Boost.DataAccess and boost::dataaccess?
>> Or even my original suggestion Boost.Access and boost::access?
> What about this one:
> Boost.DataAccess, this name could be long, as Unit Test Framework is
> long too.
> But namespace could be boost::db_access, not longer than
>> One might even access Microsoft Access (TM) with it?
> Sure. There is ODBC backend test for MS Access in the SOCI CVS.
> Mateusz Loskot
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk