Boost logo

Boost :

From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-07 19:19:43

Paul A Bristow wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Garland
>> Sent: 07 December 2006 22:37 To: boost_at_[hidden] Subject: Re:
>> [boost] SOCI 2.2.0 - The C++ Database Access Library
>>> Whatever we pick, I think we should avoid any name that isn't
>>> pretty immediately clear on a quick scan. With a few exceptions
>> (i.e. Spirit),
>>> you can quickly tell what a boost library does based solely
>> on it's name.
>> Right, I think Boost.DatabaseAccess is pretty clear.
> But rather long :-(
> How about Boost.DataAccess and boost::dataaccess?
> Or even my original suggestion Boost.Access and boost::access?

What about this one:

Boost.DataAccess, this name could be long, as Unit Test Framework is
long too.
But namespace could be boost::db_access, not longer than

> One might even access Microsoft Access (TM) with it?

Sure. There is ODBC backend test for MS Access in the SOCI CVS.


Mateusz Loskot

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at