From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-07 19:19:43
Paul A Bristow wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Garland
>> Sent: 07 December 2006 22:37 To: boost_at_[hidden] Subject: Re:
>> [boost] SOCI 2.2.0 - The C++ Database Access Library
>>> Whatever we pick, I think we should avoid any name that isn't
>>> pretty immediately clear on a quick scan. With a few exceptions
>> (i.e. Spirit),
>>> you can quickly tell what a boost library does based solely
>> on it's name.
>> Right, I think Boost.DatabaseAccess is pretty clear.
> But rather long :-(
> How about Boost.DataAccess and boost::dataaccess?
> Or even my original suggestion Boost.Access and boost::access?
What about this one:
Boost.DataAccess, this name could be long, as Unit Test Framework is
But namespace could be boost::db_access, not longer than
> One might even access Microsoft Access (TM) with it?
Sure. There is ODBC backend test for MS Access in the SOCI CVS.
-- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk