Re: [boost] separate_compilation.html

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-09 09:26:27

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:

> With respect to
> http://www.boost-consulting.com/boost/more/separate_compilation.html, I
> note that:
>
> * It needs to be updated for BBv2
>
> * It has a rationale section called "Why static linking by default?"
>   but that's the first mention of static linking in the document.  Is
>   there a section missing?

Also, I know we've been over this before, but is there a good reason
we can't use more descriptive names than BOOST_XXX_NO_LIB ?  It seems
to me that BOOST_XXX_NO_AUTO_LINK would be more suitable.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com