From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-09 09:26:27
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> With respect to
> http://www.boost-consulting.com/boost/more/separate_compilation.html, I
> note that:
> * It needs to be updated for BBv2
> * It has a rationale section called "Why static linking by default?"
> but that's the first mention of static linking in the document. Is
> there a section missing?
Also, I know we've been over this before, but is there a good reason
we can't use more descriptive names than BOOST_XXX_NO_LIB ? It seems
to me that BOOST_XXX_NO_AUTO_LINK would be more suitable.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk