From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-14 02:41:02
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>> Why is this happening now, as we approach release? Did Boost.Test
>>> unfreeze on the release branch, or did tests for this compiler just
>>> come online, or is it something else?
>> Don't really know. I did not make any changes. Guys introduced some minor
>> fixes with dllexport/dllimport declarators, but that about it.
> Can you force-disable inlining on that compiler in your library binary
> (or something like that) so that these failures turn into passes?
First of all I am not sure what you suggesting. What inlining? And how is it
related to the problems we experience?
And second I'd prefer not to make blind changes. IOW someone with compiler
access need to make and test any changes we could agree upon.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk