From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-14 04:18:38
"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>>> Why is this happening now, as we approach release? Did Boost.Test
>>>> unfreeze on the release branch, or did tests for this compiler just
>>>> come online, or is it something else?
>>> Don't really know. I did not make any changes. Guys introduced some minor
>>> fixes with dllexport/dllimport declarators, but that about it.
>> Can you force-disable inlining on that compiler in your library binary
>> (or something like that) so that these failures turn into passes?
> First of all I am not sure what you suggesting. What inlining? And how is it
> related to the problems we experience?
> And second I'd prefer not to make blind changes. IOW someone with compiler
> access need to make and test any changes we could agree upon.
I can test changes. I just don't have the time to investigate the cause.
-- Anthony Williams Software Developer Just Software Solutions Ltd http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk