|
Boost : |
From: Janek Kozicki (janek_listy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-14 05:50:58
Gennadiy Rozental said: (by the date of Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:02:05 -0500)
> > So Boost.Test *doesn't* require separate compilation?
> >
> > If that's the case, I'll remove it from the list and add a mention of
> > it to the paragraph at the bottom of the box
>
> Well. As usual the picture is gray :o)
Under this URL
http://boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/test/doc/usage/generic.html
there is written:
---- Prefer offline compiled libraries to the inline included components If you are just want to write quick simple test in environment where you never used Boost.Test before - yes, use included components. But if you plan to use Boost.Test on permanent basis, small investment of time needed to build (if not build yet), install and change you makefiles/project settings will soon return to you in a form of shorter compilation time. Why do you need to make your compiler do the same work over and over again? ---- -- Janek Kozicki |
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk