Boost logo

Boost :

From: Janek Kozicki (janek_listy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-14 05:50:58

Gennadiy Rozental said: (by the date of Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:02:05 -0500)

> > So Boost.Test *doesn't* require separate compilation?
> >
> > If that's the case, I'll remove it from the list and add a mention of
> > it to the paragraph at the bottom of the box
> Well. As usual the picture is gray :o)

Under this URL

there is written:

Prefer offline compiled libraries to the inline included components
If you are just want to write quick simple test in environment where
you never used Boost.Test before - yes, use included components. But
if you plan to use Boost.Test on permanent basis, small investment of
time needed to build (if not build yet), install and change you
makefiles/project settings will soon return to you in a form of
shorter compilation time. Why do you need to make your compiler do
the same work over and over again?
Janek Kozicki                                                         |

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at