From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-15 08:26:18
"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> This is not clear cut. I do not see in theory why any boost::variant
>>> algorithm couldn't be optimized to almost the same code (module type
>>> switching). On the other hand excessive usage of tuples will cause
>>> appropriate code bloat, eventually leading to code slow down.
>> Not clear cut at all. When operating on a sequence where all the
>> types are different, the version with variant will be both slower and
> I love these performance "estimations"
> Do you have any numbers to sustain this?
No, sorry. It's simply obvious.
Feel free to prove me wrong if it isn't obvious to you.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk