Re: [boost] [serialization] regressions due to recent changes in/libs/serialization/test/tes_tools.hpp

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-16 12:32:32

Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Uh oh - I meant to check this into the HEAD only.  If this is not
>> the case its a HUGE mistake on my part.  Let me look into this.
>>
>> Robert Ramey

Browsing the online CVS tree looks to me that the changes have been checked 
into the HEAD and only the HEAD.   This is what I intended and I would have 
thought this was OK.  What am I missing here?  Is checking into the HEAD 
affection the RC_1_34_0 branch?  Is the RC_1_34_0 somehow dependent on the 
HEAD.Is it possible that the test RC_1_34_0 test results in 
RudbekAssociates-V2 are using the head rather than the RC_1_34_0 ?  I would 
be happy to fix it if I knew how.

Robert Ramey