From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-16 12:32:32
Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Uh oh - I meant to check this into the HEAD only. If this is not
>> the case its a HUGE mistake on my part. Let me look into this.
>> Robert Ramey
Browsing the online CVS tree looks to me that the changes have been checked
into the HEAD and only the HEAD. This is what I intended and I would have
thought this was OK. What am I missing here? Is checking into the HEAD
affection the RC_1_34_0 branch? Is the RC_1_34_0 somehow dependent on the
HEAD.Is it possible that the test RC_1_34_0 test results in
RudbekAssociates-V2 are using the head rather than the RC_1_34_0 ? I would
be happy to fix it if I knew how.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk