From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-16 12:14:25
Uh oh - I meant to check this into the HEAD only. If this is not the case
its a HUGE mistake on my part. Let me look into this.
"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" wrote:
> Recent changes in test_tools.hpp aimed at switching from
> Boost.Test to boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp are
> causing lots of regressions, seemingly because the switch
> is not complete and the still linker misses some components
> from Boost.Test, see for instance http://tinyurl.com/yfohqh .
> As a result, the regression count has raised to 280 :(
> and possibly growing.
> I don't want to sound rude, but was it necessary to do
> this potentially dangerous change precisely now that we
> were so very close to being able to release a beta? If
> the change was aimed at solving some regression, it'd be
> good to know what the problem was so that maybe we can
> find some other, less drastic, workaround. Again, I don't
> want to offend anyone and maybe there's good reason
> for having commited the change.
> Thank you,
> Joaquín M López Muñoz
> Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk