From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-13 05:54:48
David Abrahams wrote:
> Please make the fix in the HEAD, too! And update the
> merged_to_RC_1_34 tag!
I do understand, that it is a boost policy to change in HEAD and then
merge to the release branch. However I am currently in a kind of
1) We started thread_rewrite, as you might remember, and Anthony and me
already were asked to move this to HEAD.
2) We are bugfixing for the RC_1_34_0 branch.
3) I have several options:
*) Do bug-fixing in RC_1_34_0, leave HEAD orphaned for the
moment, move thread_rewrite to HEAD after release.
*) Keeping HEAD in sync with RC_1_34_0 until release and then
purge HEAD and move thread_rewrite to HEAD.
*) Purge HEAD now, move thread_rewrite to HEAD now, do
bug-fixing in RC_1_34_0.
I am following the first path for the moment to save time.
I would be very interested in your opinion in this matter, and
to receive some advice how you think we should proceed.
The main problem is, that HEAD and RC_1_34_0 are already very
divergent for path 1 and 3, and path 2 only costs time.
>> I suggested, that it would be useful to be able to specify the name of
>> the script in the using docutils statement, just as is possible with
>> the other tools.
> Feel free to make that improvement in CVS. I just did what I needed
> in order to get going. I'm sure we could do more.
Ok, if I have time, I will look into this. For the moment the link is
working for me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk