From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-15 20:53:05
David Abrahams writes:
> Douglas Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > |concept_check|
> > class_concept_fail_expected: borland-5.6.4 borland-5.8.2 borland-5.8.2 msvc-6.5 msvc-6.5 msvc-7.0
> > stl_concept_covering: borland-5.8.2 borland-5.8.2 gcc-3.3.6 gcc-3.4.5_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.0.3_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc
> Jeremy Siek checked in expected failures markup for all these tests
> well over one week ago. The markup looks OK to me, but the failures
> are still showing up. What's going on here?
The markup was invalid (structure-wise). I've committed a fix and also
tightened the schema a bit to catch similar errors in the future.
Thanks for the heads-up,
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk