From: Peder Holt (peder.holt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-18 05:47:18
2007/1/18, Arkadiy Vertleyb <vertleyb_at_[hidden]>:
> "Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]> wrote
> > The issue is that, like other compilers, including such EDG-based
> > compilers as como-4_3_3-vc7_1 and cxx on Tru64, the HP-UX aCC6 compiler
> > does not support typeof keyword in default mode (both cxx and aCC6
> > support it in Gnu dialect mode). For toolsets using compilers that do
> > support typeof keyword, the "*_native" group of typeof library tests is
> > marked expected failure (there are some 19 tests in this group). The
> > patch below adds "acc" to the list of these toolsets. Please, apply it
> > to CVS HEAD and the RC branch.
> This is a simple change in explicit-failures-markup.xml. The question is,
> should we (are we allowed to at this point) apply a change that is not
> related to a release compiler?
I already commited the changes to the release branch...
There are regression results for this compiler for the RC branch.
What other criterias are needed to categorize a compiler as a release compiler?
If this turns out to be an issue, I'll revert the changes.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk