Re: [boost] [wave] Recent check-ins broke wave onTru64/CXX/RC_1_34_0

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-23 09:25:10

Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> Is there a tool to unmangle the names?

nm -mangled_name_also *.o | grep symbol_reported_as_multiply_defined

Markus, the problem may go away if you compile -tlocal instead 
of -timplicit_local, but you, probably, would not want to change instantiation 
mode just for one library.

Boris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] [wave] Recent check-ins broke wave onTru64/CXX/RC_1_34_0

> Markus,
>
>> The compilation of wave actually succeeds, but linking
>> libboost_wave-d-1_34.so.1.34.0 complains about multiply
>> defined symbols.
>> See http://tinyurl.com/ysqbex for further details.
>>
>> This has been broken recently (not more than 2 weeks ago) and
>> I noticed that there are some check-ins related to wave in
>> this time frame.
>>
>> Does that ring a bell with anyone?
>>
>> BTW, there are two references to 1.34 in the name of the
>> generated library.
>> Is that how it's supposed to be? Isn't the 1.34.0 suffix
>> after .so somehow wrong?
>
> Is there a tool to unmangle the names? This could help me finding a clue
> what's wrong.
>
> Regards Hartmut
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>