From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-23 09:25:10
Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> Is there a tool to unmangle the names?
nm -mangled_name_also *.o | grep symbol_reported_as_multiply_defined
Markus, the problem may go away if you compile -tlocal instead
of -timplicit_local, but you, probably, would not want to change instantiation
mode just for one library.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] [wave] Recent check-ins broke wave onTru64/CXX/RC_1_34_0
>> The compilation of wave actually succeeds, but linking
>> libboost_wave-d-1_34.so.1.34.0 complains about multiply
>> defined symbols.
>> See http://tinyurl.com/ysqbex for further details.
>> This has been broken recently (not more than 2 weeks ago) and
>> I noticed that there are some check-ins related to wave in
>> this time frame.
>> Does that ring a bell with anyone?
>> BTW, there are two references to 1.34 in the name of the
>> generated library.
>> Is that how it's supposed to be? Isn't the 1.34.0 suffix
>> after .so somehow wrong?
> Is there a tool to unmangle the names? This could help me finding a clue
> what's wrong.
> Regards Hartmut
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk