Re: [boost] [wave] Recent check-ins broke wave onTru64/CXX/RC_1_34_0

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-24 10:53:19

Markus Schoepflin wrote:
>> Boris Gubenko wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure why you mention spirit in this context, but it works, at least
>> the tests pass with -tlocal (I've replaced -timplicit_local with -tlocal in
>> hp_cxx.jam):
>
> Wave is built upon spirit, if my memory serves me right.

Ok, thanks for the clarification, Markus.

Boris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Markus Schöpflin" <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] [wave] Recent check-ins broke wave onTru64/CXX/RC_1_34_0

> Boris Gubenko wrote:
>> Markus Schoepflin wrote:
>>> Boris Gubenko wrote:
>>>> Markus, the problem may go away if you compile -tlocal instead
>>>> of -timplicit_local, but you, probably, would not want to change
>>>> instantiation
>>>> mode just for one library.
>>> Other parts of boost depend on the control given by -timplicit_local,
>>
>> I understand. I'm not suggesting tweaking template instantiation mode
>> just for this issue.
>>
>>> I even have no idea if spirit would work with -tlocal.
>>
>> I'm not sure why you mention spirit in this context, but it works, at least
>> the tests pass with -tlocal (I've replaced -timplicit_local with -tlocal in
>> hp_cxx.jam):
>
> Wave is built upon spirit, if my memory serves me right.
>
> Markus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>