From: Matthias Schabel (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-28 15:05:36
> Ok, I probably won't get to do this until Friday again...that's the
> I get to work on personal things at work for a few hours...I don't
> have VC.
I don't have access to it at all, so I appreciate any help in getting
things to function
correctly under VC++...
> I was profiling my own version and it was dog slow compared to
> I wanted to check yours. I did here at home with g++ on Linux and
> two versions compare equally wrt the static dim quantity. I had to
> really vamp up the optimizations of course to get them as fast as
> doubles (I couldn't find the right options for VC) and I still
> can't do
I haven't spent much time (following the Boost admonition to focus on
clarity and correctness before optimization) tuning performance yet.
I don't believe
that there is anything in the quantity class that can't, in
principle, be optimized
away. That being said, principle and practice can be separated by a
gulf at times...good compiler inlining will be critical to optimization.
Any input on optimizing the library would be most welcome - I expect
that it should
be possible to have code using quantities run exactly as fast as for
built in types,
but that remains to be proven...
> as deep a recursion level without a seg fault...this is actually by
> quite a margin...several orders of magnitude. Both versions fail
> at the
> same point. Here is test code...add a 0 to the end of tlim and I
> get a
> crash on the quantity version:
I'm personally more concerned about runtime performance than
recursion at this
point, but this is an interesting point... I'm not completely clear
on what you mean
about increasing tlim : do you mean that the equivalent code with
recurse several orders of magnitude deeper, and mcs::units recurses
of magnitude deeper than your quantity code?
> COMMAND LINE:
> nroberts_at_localhost ~/projects/prof_units $ g++ -I/home/nroberts/units
> -pg -O3 prof_mcs.cpp
> This is likely implementation dependant and maybe there's still
> more ops.
It looks like I'm having a dumb day today. Do you mean that there are
in the quantity code than there are for doubles???
Anyway, thanks for the feedback...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk