From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-29 05:37:53
On Monday 29 January 2007 12:55, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Vladimir Prus writes:
> > I've checked in the attached (HEAD and RC). The failure in question
> > was reported a couple of times, and nothing happens, which means we
> > get to release 1.34.0 with it.
> FYI, there is a special markup notation for unresearched failures:
> <mark-expected-failures reason="?">
That's literal "?", right?
> It both makes it easier for a library/platform user to spot them in
> the reports, and easier for developers to return and research them
Thanks, I'll use this. Is this syntax documented anywhere?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk