|
Boost : |
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-29 05:37:53
On Monday 29 January 2007 12:55, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Vladimir Prus writes:
> > I've checked in the attached (HEAD and RC). The failure in question
> > was reported a couple of times, and nothing happens, which means we
> > get to release 1.34.0 with it.
>
> FYI, there is a special markup notation for unresearched failures:
>
> <mark-expected-failures reason="?">
> ^^^^^^^^^^
That's literal "?", right?
> ...
> </mark-expected-failures>
>
>
> It both makes it easier for a library/platform user to spot them in
> the reports, and easier for developers to return and research them
> later.
Thanks, I'll use this. Is this syntax documented anywhere?
- Volodya
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk