From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-30 05:38:39
Roland Schwarz wrote:
> 3) Failing test tests:
> This is a DLL issue. In file
> the compiler coplains about base class test_unit
> not defined, despite it is. The compiler seems
> to have problems to see this class as defined.
> Something (possibly templated memebers?) are
> prohibiting this when the class is flagged as
> *) Is this a known issue?
> *) Can we safely flag these tests as n/a?
> A comment in libs/test/build/Jamfile.v2
> let me believe so.
This one is truely weird: it looks like an obvious compiler issue to me.
What happens if we add a build requirement to Boost.Test that only static
libraries are supported with msvc-6: something like
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/libs/test/build/Jamfile.v2,v
retrieving revision 220.127.116.11
diff -u -r18.104.22.168 Jamfile.v2
--- Jamfile.v2 10 Nov 2006 19:59:52 -0000 22.214.171.124
+++ Jamfile.v2 30 Jan 2007 10:03:23 -0000
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
# Disable Warning about boost::noncopyable not being
Which seems to be worthwhile applying whatever? Note that it doesn't solve
all the issues though: mearly turns compile-time failures to run-time
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk