|
Boost : |
From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-01 18:49:19
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> These should be marked as expected failures and happily ignored.
Do you have any objections to apply the attached patch to
libs/test/test/Jamfile.v2
and only mark the remaining tests as expected to fail?
Regards Roland
Index: Jamfile.v2
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/libs/test/test/Jamfile.v2,v
retrieving revision 1.9.2.2
diff -u -r1.9.2.2 Jamfile.v2
--- Jamfile.v2 30 Nov 2006 10:30:09 -0000 1.9.2.2
+++ Jamfile.v2 1 Feb 2007 23:44:04 -0000
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
: $(pattern_file)
: #<stlport-iostream>on
<toolset>borland:<cxxflags>-w-8080
+ <toolset>msvc-6.5:<link>static
<define>BOOST_TEST_NO_AUTO_LINK=1 # requirements
: $(test-name)
] ;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk