|
Boost : |
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-02 10:02:52
Hi,
I couldn't find a way to do this. Maybe I have overlooked something.
Anyway, making sure that operator<, operator== does the right thing is
pretty important.
I had in mind that I could say
for( each i )
for( each i2 )
BOOST_CHECK_STRICT_WEAK_ORDERING( *i, *i2 );
which would check something like the following:
if( !(*i < *i2) && !(*i2 < *i) )
{
BOOST_CHECK( *i == *i2 );
}
else if( *i < *i2 )
{
BOOST_CHECK( *i != *i2 );
BOOST_CHECK( !(*i2 < *i) );
}
else
{
BOOST_CHECK( *i2 < *i );
BOOST_CHECK( !(*i2 < *i) );
}
-Thorsten
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk