From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-12 01:12:50
K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2007, at 2:24 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> This is the summary of regression results as I see it:
>> 1. We have a number of regressions with intel-linux-9.0.
>> In Martin's result most failures are due to an command line option
>> that intel-9.0 does not understand, and Martin's results
>> were not updated since I've checked in the fix.
> Martin, your latest run (Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:42:11 +0000) still seems
> to have this same problem.
And linker errors still mention -h option that's supposed to be
replaced with -soname in intel-linux.jam, so this suggests something
was not updated.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk