From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-18 20:27:14
John Maddock wrote:
> I've been looking at some of the remaining regressions, and I have a fix for
> the issue here: http://tinyurl.com/yq6a5o
> I'm a little bit dubious about this patch, because I don't believe the fix
> should be necessary in the first place (can't understand why the compiler's
> complaining in the first place!), however it does fix the issue and appears
> harmless for the msvc/intel/gcc/borland compilers I've tested with. OK to
> go ahead and apply?
It's dubious indeed. All I can say that it seems very unlikely that the
problem is on our side of the fence. So I think it's the right thing to do.
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk