From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-19 05:01:41
Thomas Witt wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> I've been looking at some of the remaining regressions, and I have a
>> fix for the issue here: http://tinyurl.com/yq6a5o
>> I'm a little bit dubious about this patch, because I don't believe
>> the fix should be necessary in the first place (can't understand why
>> the compiler's complaining in the first place!), however it does fix
>> the issue and appears harmless for the msvc/intel/gcc/borland
>> compilers I've tested with. OK to go ahead and apply?
> It's dubious indeed. All I can say that it seems very unlikely that
> the problem is on our side of the fence. So I think it's the right
> thing to do.
> Please commit.
Done, if there are any regressions, I'll just back it out and mark up the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk