From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-19 10:32:21
Anthony Williams wrote:
> Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Roland Schwarz wrote:
>>> The problem I see is, that boost 1.34 has specified an outdated (and
>>> unsupported) version of the stlport as belonging to the release set.
>> To be honest this does not bother me too much. It might be unsupported
>> but I seriously doubt it's unused. For the record the release set is not
>> so much guided by sophisticated planning as it is by available
>> regression tests. Sad but true.
> I recently installed stlport 5.1 for work purposes, and could easily set up
> the my regression test runs to use that. However, it was agreed that we would
> not add any new test platforms this late in the day, so I haven't done so.
Right, please don't add anything at this point. What I meant to say is
availability of regression tests at some point in the distant past ;-)
PS: We should look at 5.1 as soon as we get 1.34 out the door.
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk