From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-19 04:30:23
Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Roland Schwarz wrote:
>> The problem I see is, that boost 1.34 has specified an outdated (and
>> unsupported) version of the stlport as belonging to the release set.
> To be honest this does not bother me too much. It might be unsupported
> but I seriously doubt it's unused. For the record the release set is not
> so much guided by sophisticated planning as it is by available
> regression tests. Sad but true.
I recently installed stlport 5.1 for work purposes, and could easily set up
the my regression test runs to use that. However, it was agreed that we would
not add any new test platforms this late in the day, so I haven't done so.
-- Anthony Williams Just Software Solutions Ltd - http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk