From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-26 11:59:03
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
>>----- Mensaje original -----
>>So, the problem is far (IMHO) from simple and involves
>>other important and as of yet not completely settled
>>issues like move constructors and extended allocators
> Ok, so the problem is essentially
> cause by the lack of contruction functions for the
> And placement new + ~T() + allocate() + deallocate()
> is not a viable approach to avoid using construct()/destroy()?
Do you know why placement new is insufficient?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk