Re: [boost] [Review][bimap]

From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-26 11:59:03

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
> 
>>----- Mensaje original -----
> 
> 
>>So, the problem is far (IMHO) from simple and involves
>>other important and as of yet not completely settled
>>issues like move constructors and extended allocators
>>(see http://www.open-
>>std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n2045.html,
>>problem #5). 
> 
> 
> Ok, so the problem is essentially
> cause by the lack of contruction functions for the
> allocator.
> 
> And placement new + ~T() + allocate() + deallocate()
> is not a viable approach to avoid using construct()/destroy()?

JOAQUIN,

Do you know why placement new is insufficient?

-Thorsten