From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-01 04:40:11
Boris Gubenko wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> Can you test the attached patch then? If you can assure me that the
>> RW version check is correct (presumably you will up the version
>> number if the issue gets fixed?), and that it has no unfortunate
>> effects on the other Boost regression tests [...]
> Unfortunately, the patch broke some tests, in particular, 9 tr1
> library tests. This is because roguewave.hpp #include's <iterator>.
> inclusion of <iterator> makes the tests fail. I did not analyze the
> failures, I guess, the tests don't expect <iterator> to be included.
> I think, we have 3 options:
> 1) put your fix in some regex library header which includes <iterator>
> 2) put my original fix which does not require any headers in
> 3) do nothing: mark tests affected by this RW bug expected failures
> and wait for the compiler kit with the fix (for the reference, this
> RW bug is tracked internally as CR JAGag33243).
> I'm running the tests with 2) now, to verify that it indeed is a
> viable solution.
Oh shucks, I forgot about that, try:
# ifndef BOOST_TR1_NO_RECURSION
# define BOOST_TR1_NO_RECURSION
# define BOOST_CONFIG_NO_ITERATOR_RECURSION
# include <iterator>
# ifdef BOOST_CONFIG_NO_ITERATOR_RECURSION
# undef BOOST_TR1_NO_RECURSION
# undef BOOST_CONFIG_NO_ITERATOR_RECURSION
In any case this is too late for 1.34 now whatever.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk