From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-01 05:49:39
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>>I noticed Range Library Core proposal
>>>removed 'range_size' metafunction.
>>>It was replaced by 'range_difference'?
>>>(But, cvs head is not affected.)
>>Right. A proposal for the standard and boost is two different things.
> The 'boost::range_size' of 'iterator_range' is defined as 'std::size_t'.
> Can it guarantee to represent any difference_type of iterator?
Anyway, I plan to change boost::size() to return iterator_difference.
(If there is one thing I hate about C++ containers it has to be the use
>>>If so, why 'std::size' too is proposed?
>>>'std::distance' seems enough.
>>So that you may have the guarantee that the function is O(1) complexity.
> 'std::distance'(24.3.4/1) also seems to guarantee it?
Only for random access iterators. std::size() would only accept random
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk