From: Stjepan Rajko (stipe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-04 11:53:21
> From: Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [boost] boost::signal thread safety
> I'm currently reasonably satisfied with the state of thread_safe_signals.
> My plan now is to finish an updated version of the signals documentation
> that is sufficient to describe the changes that have been made, and then
> put the code and documentation in a tarball so it is easier for people to
> try out. Time and experience should clarify any remaining problem areas.
I downloaded the library from the sandbox CVS and am looking forward
to trying it out. I feel that the "signal flow" mechanism I'm working
on makes more sense and has more potential benefits in multi-threaded
environments so I'd like to add support for your implementation of
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk