From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-22 05:46:03
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Anthony Williams wrote:
>> For a non-pthreads platform, it might make sense to implement
>> pthreads in terms of the C++ interface, which is implementes in terms
>> of the native API, rather than implement the C++ interface in terms
>> of pthreads, which is then implemented in terms of the native API.
> Yes, this is possible, and there are no technical reasons to avoid this
> implementation approach. There are, how should I put that, ideological
> reasons to not target non-pthread platforms directly, though. At some point
> we need to draw a line and say: this is the thread abstraction we're coding
> against, and could vendors please get along with the program?
Well, if we *do* include pthreads AND a C++ API as part of the C++ Standard,
then that's quite a good hint. It doesn't mean that you have to implement one
in terms of the other, though.
> This stance is obviously unsustainable if there are strong technical reasons
> against it. But I think that there aren't.
Is performance not a legitimate reason? What about avoiding unnecessary
>> Lets take call_once, for example. PThreads only allows a real
>> function with no parameters returning void as the once function. This
>> is relatively easy to implement on top of a C++-style call_once that
>> allows arbitrary function objects with parameters, whereas it is much
>> harder to do the reverse.
> There is a note in N2178 that shows how to implement call_once on top of
> pthread_once2_np. ;-)
I know that it's possible, just "much harder": pretty much anything is more
typedef once_flag pthread_once_t;
int pthread_once(pthread_once_t* once_control,void(*init_routine)())
Since on Windows the code for call_once is pretty much the same whether or not
init_routine takes arguments, it seems pointless to go round the houses
setting thread-specific data just for the benefit of writing call_once in
terms of pthread_once rather than vice versa.
-- Anthony Williams Just Software Solutions Ltd - http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk