Re: [boost] [Report] 79 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-03-22)

From: JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-24 08:29:18

----- Mensaje original -----
De: Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval_at_[hidden]>
Fecha: Sábado, Marzo 24, 2007 12:16 pm
Asunto: Re: [boost] [Report] 79 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-03-22)
Para: boost_at_[hidden]

> Joe Gottman wrote:
> > Zach Laine wrote:
> >> On 3/22/07, Douglas Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>> Boost Regression test failures
> >>> Report time: 2007-03-22T00:20:02Z
> >>>
> >>> This report lists all regression test failures on release 
> platforms.>>>
> >>> Detailed report:
> >>>   http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-
> RC_1_34_0/developer/issues.html>>>
> >>> |optional|
> >>>   optional_test:  msvc-6.5  msvc-6.5  msvc-6.5_stlport4  msvc-7.0
> >>>   optional_test_ref_fail2:  msvc-7.1  msvc-8.0
> > 
> >     I think that optional_test_ref_fail2 has been removed from 
> > the list of tests, so these two can be ignored.
> 
> Or better, make the test suite ignore them.
> 
> Fernando claimed to have fixed the optional_test failure, and to 
> have removed the optional_test_ref_fail2 test completely a few
> *weeks* ago, but still they show up. How can that be? Something
> is fishy here... Was he wrong?

In this post:

  http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2007/03/117750.php

Fernando suggests that the optional_test regressions for
MSVC 6.5/7.0 be marked as expected failures, but this hasn't
been done yet. I can take care of this next Monday unless
someone does it before.

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo