Re: [boost] units review

From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-29 21:14:55

AMDG

Noah Roberts <roberts.noah <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Exactly.  One would expect it to follow conventions.  Also see the 
> static_rational, which I think needs its own review and be added to the 
> math library.

I don't know about that.  static_rational has a
special constraint that doesn't apply to mpl integral
constants: equal values must have the same type.

> I did not time it but I did compare it relative to both my own home 
> brewed quantity class and to doubles.
>
> <snip>

Ok.  After the interface is settled I'll see how
much I can optimize without damaging the code.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe