From: Konstantin Litvinenko (Konstantin.Litvinenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-03 02:43:58
You wrote to Caleb Epstein on Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:46:48 +0300:
KL> I can say only about log4cpp. I don't see any problem with it
KL> runtime configuration. I can control all aspects of logging. Yes,
KL> sometimes function arguments and return values surprise me, but this
KL> can be easily fixed to be more natural. Also I never do configuring by
KL> hands - only from config files. Recently I added factories into library
KL> to make writting different kind of configurators easy task. About
KL> bloating. I know every peace of library and can say that there is
KL> samething not needed.
Ups, should read "...and can't say that there is samething not needed."
With best regards, Konstantin Litvinenko.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk