Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Matthias Schabel (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-03 14:34:35

Next message: Michael Goldshteyn: "Re: [boost] 1.34 - ZERO FAILURES"
Previous message: JD: "Re: [boost] A meta-proposal for logging"
In reply to: Malte Clasen: "Re: [boost] units review"
Next in thread: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] units review"

> I still have to evaluate this library thoroughly, but I'm pretty sure

Hi Malte,

Just a friendly reminder that we're looking forward to your
review ;^) Currently we have 5 yes and 3 no votes.

Cheers,

Matthias

Next message: Michael Goldshteyn: "Re: [boost] 1.34 - ZERO FAILURES"
Previous message: JD: "Re: [boost] A meta-proposal for logging"
In reply to: Malte Clasen: "Re: [boost] units review"
Next in thread: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] units review"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk