|
Boost : |
From: Tom Brinkman (reportbase_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-13 00:32:36
Its entirely up to Matthias. If he thinks more time is needed for a proper
review of the library, beyond even the extension date, it appropriate to add
days, as many as are needed. If it gets to long however, we might consider
overlapping it with the next review, in this case the GUID library. The
"ten" day period is just a rule of thumb and entirely flexible. Large
libraries will often need more days for the review.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk